"Let me state also that the battle against Zionism must be waged first, not on the shores of the Mediterranean, but in Zionism's most powerful bastion -- the USA."

The Torah True Jews (http://jewsnotzionists.org)

*Cries of joy and mockery

"Five Israelis who had worked for a moving company based in New Jersey are being held in U.S. prisons for what the Federal Bureau of Investigation has described as 'puzzling behavior' following the terror attack on the World Trade Center in New York last Tuesday. ... The five had worked for the company, which is owned by an Israeli ... the FBI had arrested the five for 'puzzling behavior'. They are said to have had been caught videotaping the disaster and shouting in what was interpreted as 'cries of joy and mockery'."

Ha'aretz, Israel, Monday, 17/09/2001

The National Journal is 'puzzled' as well. On a working day, these Israelis had video cameras on hand to record the disastrous event when they were supposed to be working. What premoni-tionery powers these Israelis have, to be aware that something enormous would happen. It is especially remarkable as their business is not related in any sense to the photographic industry. In fact, they were in the removal business.

The National Journal, along with the civilized world, is shocked and outraged by the massive loss of innocent lives, caused by this most murderous attack in the history of man in peace time and on civil targets on mainland America.

	"The United States of Israel" have tested many nuclear bombs and are the only country in history which has the du-bious honour of unleashing these monstrous weapons upon civilian populations on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nakasagi as a "live" expe-riment, using real human guinea pigs for their scientific sadistic pleasure. These were two real holocaust experiments without compensation.

Four commercial air planes struck deep into the heart of the American dream. September 11, 2001 was the day America's luck ran out. The dimension of the tragedy cannot be comprehended. And above all, how it was achieved. It was the largest, most murderous and spectacular terrorist onslaught in history, unleashed against the United States - a sequence of coordinated attacks against targets in New York and Washington which destroyed the World Trade Center in New York (the symbol of wealth and influence) and blew up a large section of the Pentagon, the command centre and symbol of US military might. The attacks left tens of thousands dead and injured. This is America's first taste of war on the American mainland. To date it has been America that reserved the exclusive right to wreak destruction, havoc and hell upon the lands of other peoples, razing entire countries to the ground, all in the name of democracy.

The Western media has been swift in pointing the finger of blame at Islamic terrorist groups without a hint of circumstantial evidence, let alone REAL evidence. In past cases of terrorist attacks on American properties and interests it has been noticed, that the person or the persons, claimed to be responsible, were identified and captured in a very short time. This is the constant American feature of combating terrorism. This latest, most murderous onslaught on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, reminds us of a Hollywood disaster movie, picturing Armageddon. The blame, poured over the world's worst terrorist outrage is focused firmly at "fanatics", based in the Middle East and in particular at Osama Bin Laden, a Saudi dissident in exile, suspected of financing Muslim terrorism.

Muslim groups are chosen as the obvious culprits because their suicide squads have been inflicting casualties amongst the Israeli population in defence of the outgunned Palestinian people: "34 years of Israel's brutal occupation of Arab land. ... Ask an Arab how he responds to 20,000 or 30,000 innocent deaths and he or she will respond as decent people should, that it is an unspeakable crime. But they will ask why we did not use such words about the sanctions that have destroyed the lives of perhaps half a million children in Iraq, why we did not rage about the 17,500 civilians killed in Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon. And those basic reasons why the Middle East caught fire last September ­ the Israeli occupation of Arab land, the dispossession of Palestinians, the bombardments and state-sponsored executions ... all these must be obscured lest they provide the smallest fractional reason for yesterday's mass savagery. ... Muslims and their families burnt by American-made bombs and weapons. ... America has bankrolled Israel's wars for so many years that it believed this would be cost-free. (Independent, London, Sep. 12, 2001, p. 6)

Are Islamic groups or Osama Bin Laden the only ones that have a motive and the means to launch such a uniquely orchestrated, devastating attack on the American political system straight to the heart of the American power centres?: "If Mr bin Laden was really guilty of all the things for which he has been blamed, he would need an army of 10,000. And there is something deeply disturbing about the world's habit of turning to the latest hate figure whenever blood is shed. But when events of this momentous scale take place, there is a new legitimacy in casting one's eyes at those who have constantly threatened America. ... Mr bin Laden is clearly unaware of the world around him. ... Was this really a man who could damage America? ... Was he really so powerful and deadly?" asks Robert Fisk (Independent, Sep. 12, 2001, p. 6) Mr Ben Ladin was immediately accused of organising the Oklahoma Bombing until information proved the contrary and another suspect, Timothy McVeigh, was arrested and recently executed.

Robert Fisk, an expert on Middle East affairs, rules those out who could not possibly have been responsible for the onslaught on America: "The rag-tag Palestinian groups that used to favour hijacking are unlikely to be able to produce a single suicide bomber. Hamas and Islamic Jihad have neither the capability nor the money that this assault needed. Perhaps the groups that moved close to the Lebanese Hizbollah in the 1980s, before the organisation became solely a resistance movement, could plan something like this. The bombing of the US Marines in 1983 needed precision, timing and infinite planning. But Iran, which supported these groups, has changed out of recognition since then, now more involved in its internal struggles than in the long-dead aspiration to 'export' a religious revolution. Iraq lies broken, its agents more intent on torturing their own people than striking at the country that defeated it so suddenly in 1991, the US." (Independent, Sep 12, 2001, p. 6)

Augusto Pradetto, an expert on intelligence agencies, employed by the German Army University of Hamburg, stated: "Neither the Taliban, Bin Laden, nor any other Muslim organisation could have launched such a sophisticated onslaught. Not even Middle Eastern intelligence services would have been able to accomplish that. The British intelligence service ruled out the involvement of Iraq in the attack." (n-tv News, Sep. 17, 2001, 23:15h, n-tv.de)

"After all, this was no random attack but one that must have needed months of planning. If, as seemed likely, it did originate somewhere in the Middle East, many people there and the US must have taken part in the preparations. " Independent, Sep 12, 2001, p. 3)

Let us look at possible motives for the devastating attack. At this present time the world's sympathy has been steadily growing towards the Palestinian people and the Arab states in general. This sympathy culminated in the recent Durban UN-conference on racism, which roundly condemned Israel for racism and crimes against humanity. Israeli quotations are suggesting a long-drawn-out struggle, like an Israeli Waterloo, was developing, which in a long term fight the Jewish state could only lose. "OC Northern Command Major-General Gabby Ashkenazy reportedly called the soldiers 'rags' - an Israeli term for cowards - and 'crybabies'." (Jewish Chronicle, London, Feb. 18, 2000, p. 3)

In an open war of conservative military tactics, the Israeli Army, backed up by America, would surely triumph. But man to man in close combat and street fighting, it is well known, the Israelis would flee on foot: "Israeli soldiers were ordered to flee [from Lebanon] on foot - yes, run - and leave behind even their prayer shawls and phylacteries ... 'there is no military solution' ... But this is exactly what Israel's defence minister and army commanders are saying, although they are up against only a few hundred active fighters and a few hundred more random fighters that the Palestinians and the Hezbollah together can produce. ... And this weakness is what trapped former prime minister Yitzhak Rabin into agreeing to Oslo. This is the behavior of a defeated, dishonored army, devoid of even minimal fighting spirit." (Ha'aretz, Israel, July 19, 2001)

Thanks to the attack on the WTC and the Pentagon, Israel, the ethnostate with apartheid-type legal system that distinguishes Jews and non-Jews in everything from immigration to public services, has been granted card blanche to wipe out large chunks of Palestine without being condemned by world opinion or to be noticed by the world's media. "The American star columnist and Pulitzer-Award-Winner, Charles Krauthammer, believes that it is 'inevitable' that Israel starts a war by itself. 'Every element of infra-structure in Arafat's police-state must be destroyed: headquaters, police stations, TV-stations and news papers, close to Arafat's government.' The very influential publisher gives the Israelis a few days for a 'vast and all-out' campaign. He is convinced it will happen very soon." (Der Spiegel 37/2001, p. 190)

Now, of all the nations who would have the most reason to benefit from a devastating attack on mainland America? The Palestinians certainly not, as they have gained the sympathy of the world, which they are about to lose again after this tragedy. The other well known "Rogue-States", as the Independent pointed out, are in no position to launch anything as sophisticated as this attack and would be committing suicide. Which nation would have the closest intelligence co-operation with open access anywhere in America and in Western states? It requires little intelligence to answer, it is the "besieged" state of Israel. "What's needed is a unified, unifying, Pearl Harbor sort of purple American fury -- a ruthless indignation that doesn't lead away in a week or two." (Time Magazine, September 11, 2001, Inside back cover.) Whoever created the attack on America destroyed the rising tide of sympathy for the Palestinians. It was exactly what Israel needed: something to unite America in hate-riotism against Israel's enemies. "Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, 'It's very good'." (New York Times, Sep. 12, 2001, p. A22). And former Israeli Prime-Minister Ehud Barak added:  "The whole world has now to start a world war against the enemies of Israel." (Le Monde, Sep. 13, 2001). Who would have the means, the logistics and the intelligence support to know that a strike on mainland America in such a large scale was under way? We have been constantly told in the Media and by top officials that Mossad is to be considered along with the CIA, the best secret service in the world.

It is hardly credible that these two most effective agencies knew absolutely nothing about the oncoming holocaust on American soil and were unable to stop it. But they have been quick to blame and arrest groups of Muslims in various parts of America and in Europe.

	"Osama bin Laden is clearly unaware of the world around him. ... Was this really a man who could damage Ame-rica? ... Was he really so powerful and deadly?"

In contrast to Bill Clinton, who signed a mutial-defence-treaty with Israel, the present US-Administration under George W. Bush jr. was attempting to keep the Israeli-Arabic conflict out of American mainstream politics.

Combining all this with the imminent collapse of the world's financial and economic structure, predicted by Mr Greenspan quite some time ago, a world war of some significance would be the only way out of the financial dilemma, the international investment banks finding themselves in. As the old saying in financial circles goes: "Money flows where blood is spilled." An all-out war, covering large parts of the globe is probably more important to the state of Israel and the Zionist agenda, as it is for the banking system. The 6-million holocaust story has been successfully exposed in the Islamic world as a hoax. It is therefore logical that they are targeted as the enemy of the "civilised world", since the New World Order rests on the pillars of the 6-million-story: "Achieving our quest for a new world order depends upon our learning the Holocaust's lesson." (Ian Kagedan, director of government relations for the Jewish B'nai B'rith organisation, as quoted by the Toronto Star, 26 November 1991.) Former Israeli Prime-Minister Ehud Barak told Le Monde: "It is time to wage a world war against terrorism [...] this effort has to be directed not only at the structures of people we all know : Ben Ladin, Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Djihad et some persons around Arafat. We should include the States and their leaders who shelter them. Such as Afghanistan, Iran, Irak and, in certain measure, North Corea and Libya. If there are any difficulties to find the authors, Israel has some ready. After what happened in New York and Washington, the whole world has now to start a world war against the enemies of Israel." (Le Monde, Sep. 13, 2001) It would have only been a matter of time before the holocaust revelations came to light in Europe, thanks to multicultural migration movements. Only a war of sufficient scale will keep the masses of the Goyim world occupied in the basic necessity of survival, thus eliminating any danger of terrified populations, let alone thinking about holocaust lies and revenge, whilst facing death and starvation. 

February 13/14 1945: Holocaust over Dresden, known as the Florence of the North. Dresden was a hospital city for wounded soldiers. Not one military unit, not one anti-aircraft battery was deployed in the city. Together with the 600.000 refugees from Breslau, Dresden was fil-led with nearly 1.2 million people. Churchill had as-ked for "suggestions how to blaze 600.000 refugees". He wasn't interested how to target military installations 60 miles outside of Dresden. More than 700.000 phos-phorus bombs were drop-ped on 1.2 million people. One bomb for every 2 people. The temperature in the centre of the city reached 1600 o centigra-de. More than 260.000 bodies and residues of bodies were counted. But those who perished in the centre of the city can't be traced. Appr. 500.000 children, women, the elderly, wounded soldiers and the animals of the zoo were murdered in one night.

In this present state of hysteria, we are only informed that those responsible for the Attack on America had hijacked passenger planes and deliberately targeted them into the symbols of American power and wealth. Before these sudden attacks no-one had heard via radio or TV of the hijacking of any plane, until the aircrafts had struck their targets. We are reliably informed that none of the pilots of the four hijacked planes had time or the presence of mind, despite their high level training, to even send a secret signal to ground control by just pressing a button, special facilities provided on each aircraft. In all previous known hijacks, pilots have always been able to alert, however briefly, ground control.

To organise such an onslaught, so perfectly, requires months of preparation and orchestration with great precision and it involved many people around the world. That this was going on without arousing suspicion by the most sophisticated intelligence services of the world, is hard to swallow. The operation obviously needed many terrorist cells and their support networks slipping into the country, despite repeated warnings of attacks in recent weeks. "Arms and explosives will have been secured, weeks of detailed surveillance and reconnaissance carried out, the flight patterns of the hijacked planes coordinated so that they hit the twin towers within minutes of one another to cause maximum impact." (Daily Mail, London, Sep. 12, 2001, p. 13) The keenest gatherers of intelligence on the planet, America's secret agencies, including the CIA, stumbled tragically, as it appears in the eyes of the public.

If it was true that Osama Ben Ladin, a man who is "unaware of the world around him", has been capable of organising an attack on America that, in comparison, reduces Pearl Harbour to a sporting competition, he would have to be considered the superman of the universe. Bin Laden's surrogates, if reports are reliable, obviously didn't need an intensive airline sponsored pilot training, normally lasting many years, to carry out such professional flying? They acquired their stunning flying skills in American aviation schools and by reading books about operating aircrafts, as reported by the media. As the videos prove, also the second 757 aircraft was maneuvered and flown by very highly skilled pilots. Shortly before hitting the southern tower of the World Trade Center, the aircraft made a sharp turn, whilst its flight path was professionally directed and hit the building squarely in its centre. It was that scene of precision flying, that the "waiting" media had captured, which is arousing debate, as much of the footage is not amateur videos. It is amazing that a man who doesn't know how to fly a single engine aircraft is capable of targeting a jet-liner with utmost precision into the Pentagon which could not have been achieved by a highly experienced commercial pilot: "Hani Hanshur took flight lessons but his instructors say that his flying capabilities and skills were nearly zero. Yet, it was enough to carry out the mass murder. His aircraft crashed onto the Pentagon." (Süddeutsche Zeitung, Oct. 1, 2001, p. 5) Considering the inconsistent reports, could it not be as the Independent suggests that "the US must have taken part in the preparations."

Would Zionist groups under Mossad guidance be capable of preparing, launching and consciously absorbing crimes of such dimensions? We are unable to answer this question freely with yes. However, the Mossad orchestrated assassination of John F. Kennedy comes to mind, because Kennedy denied Israel America's nuclear arms programme. We also know for a fact "that in 1967 the U.S. government conspired with the Israeli government against the American people, when on June 8, 1967, Israeli jets and torpedo boats attacked the U.S. Navy intelligence ship, the Liberty, in international waters. Thirty-four Americans were killed and 171 wounded." (Columnist Charley Reese, Orlando Sentinel, Jun. 3, 2001) The Zionists had obviously no scruples in murdering the sailors aboard the USS-Liberty in the Mediterranean sea and assassinating the American President John F. Kennedy. If the answer of Zionist direct involvement in the Attack on America is NO, the other question one must consider, is, why did Israeli intelligence agencies not inform the American authorities of the havoc being prepared?

The newly elected president, George W. Bush jr., rapidly selected a new cabinet without even one Jewish minister on board. According to Jewish columnist Philip Weiss, "the Bush campaign represented an attempt to reverse Jewishness in the establishment."  (The New York Observer, Jan. 22, 2001, p. 1) President Bush then dumped its troublesome ally Israel by not getting involved in the Israeli complex politics and struggle against the Palestinians. Even more dramatically: "America had planned to announce its recognition of a Palestinian state, and was only deflected from doing so by the terrorist attack in New York." (The Independent, 3 Oct 2001, p. 15)

General  Hamid Gul, the former director general of the Pakistani Intelligence Services ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) and then a close Amerian ally, who worked hand in hand with the American CIA, verifies the struggle between the Bush clan and Jewry: "Jews never agreed to Bush 41 (George H.W. Bush, the 41st president) or 43 (his son George W. Bush, the 43rd president). They made sure Bush senior didn't get a second term. His land-for-peace pressure in Palestine didn't suit Israel. They were also against the young Bush because he was considered too close to oil interests and the Gulf countries. Bush senior and Jim Baker had raised $150 million for Bush junior, much of it from Mideast sources or their American go-betweens. Bush 41 and Baker, as private citizens, had also facilitated the new strategic relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran. I have this from sources in both countries. So clearly the prospect of a Bush 43 was a potential danger to Israel. Jews were stunned by the way Bush stole the election in Florida. They had put big money on Al Gore. [Mossad's materminded attack on America] has given Israel's imperialist guardian parent opportunities to turn disaster into a pretext for imposing an all-encompassing military, political and economic agenda to further the cause of global capitalism." (UPI Interview with General Gul, Sep. 26, 2001)

James Baker, the string puller of the Bush camp, never made a secret about the clan's contempt towards Jewry. He publicly called out: "Fuck the Jews!" (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Dec. 15, 2000, p. 41)

This new American foreign policy was seen by Israel as being responsible for the daily increasing Israeli casualties in the struggle with the Palestinian uprising. It caused tremendous internal tension in the Jewish state. This development forced Sharon to even turn to Holocaust-Germany for help. A greater humiliation of Jewry could not be conceived.

Benjamin Franklin: "I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetrability. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews."

It is clear by media reports that one of the planes was directed at the White House in an attempt to kill President Bush. Only when the hijackers were informed that Bush was in Florida, they changed their coordinates and targeted the Pentagon instead.  The fate of John F. Kennedy comes to mind again. However, the planning for The Attack on America must have started well before the end of the Jewish reign "under" Clinton, considering years of aviation training at American facilities. Whoever has been working to instigate the beginning of World War III, understands the need of substantial pretext and it would have to be spectacular. The Attack on America was spectacular and incomparable!

Whatever the truth might be, one thing is certain. The entire media world now speaks the language of war and Mr Bush, as it seems, has eventually been successfully dragged into the Middle East scenario and far beyond: "America and Israel are one ... Israelis predicted that America would now coordinate more closely with its allies, including Israel." (International Herald Tribune, Sep. 12, 2001, p. 9). According to Israel radio (in hebrew) Kol Yisrael, Israeli Prime-Minister Ariel Sharon bragged towards his foreign minister Shimon Peres: "I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it." (Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, WRMEA, 10 Oct 2001)

The Bush administration drummed up the Nato member states' and received their solid assurance that they will stand by America when Washington retaliates with unprecedented fire power against entire Middle and Far East regions, stretching from Syria, Iraq to Iran and Pakistan.

World War III, Armageddon, Ragnarök at our doorstep?