THE PROTOCOLS "KILLED" AGAIN??
by ELIZABETH DILLING
What are these "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" which
refuse to stay dead? What is a protocol" anyway? In diplomacy,
says the dictionary, protocols are "a signed document containing
a record of the points on which agreement has been reached by
negotiating parties preliminary to a final treaty or compact".
The above Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a program for the
enslavement of the world and the destruction of the Christian
religion above all. Their circulation incites atom bomb-like
fury on the part of the people who today claim that their
religion is Pharisaism. This statement, for example, in the "Universal
Jewish Encyclopedia" (1943), is typical:
"Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature
of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence.
The TALMUD is the largest and most important single member of
that literature. . . and the study of it is essential for any
real understanding of PHARISAISM". (See photostat in my "Plot
Against Christianity" book). [The book she references here
is awesome! It is a MUST READ by everyone professing to be followers
of Christ. --BeWISE]
The basic doctrine is that only Pharisees are "MEN".
Others rank as animals to be milked or beefed. Non-Pharisees,
to quote are "the people who are like an ass - slaves who
are considered the property of the master" (Kethuboth llla).
They may be killed, their wages withheld, cheated, enslaved.
63 TALMUD books reek with these teachings. The protocols are
mild by contrast.
It is true that the non-Pharisee - "animals" are called
"GOYIM", and that Christ is taught - to be deserving
of FIVE sadistic deaths - including Crucifixion. And this is
the only, the supreme arbiter of religious "LAW" to
the so-called Jew of today. Warnings abound that certain things
must not be done if there is danger of "profaning the name"
of the "Jewish" religion by making its real teachings
known. Now we have the first complete English translation of
the Tradition of the Pharisees, which is the BABYLONIAN TALMUD,
declared complete in writing in Sura, Babylonia, in 500 AD. This
is the Jewish-approved SONCINO translation, procurable thru Jewish
bookstores for around $500. Christian clergy know no more about
it than the parakeets chirping in my cage.
Every pagan abomination lambasted by the Old Testament is argued
into approval and permission by the TALMUD, including burning
children to Molech, murder, sodomy, incest, etc.
"PROTOCOLS of the ELDERS of ZION - A Fabricated 'Historic'
Document". It is dated August 6, 1964. It is signed by
that all-out BELOVED of the PHARISEES, SEN. KENNETH KEATING and,
strangely, Sen. Thomas J. Dodd. It was procured thru the gentleman's
Congressman, and is a USA Govt. Printing Office job. Its "authorities"
are strictly "kosher".
My friendly correspondent writes:
"You will find this a very sloppy snow job. The Jews have
finally managed to get the Senate Committee to take the Protocols
off their backs; they are still hoping to have the Crucifixtion
of Christ removed from their backs by coming Ecumenical meetings!
Perhap the PROTOCOLS are no longer of much importance since we
now have the unexpurgated TALMUD to use. Nevertheless, as a taxpayer,
it seems objectionable that tax-money was spent in issuing such
a sloppy job of research on a subject about which there is such
a vast literature.... One of their authorities cited, John S.
Curtiss...is said to have published his impartial study in 1948.
I have a copy of his book, "AN APPRAISAL Of The PROTOCOLS
Of ZION". . . It was published in 1942, not 1948 . . . He
notes that no mention is made of the Appeal decision in the Berne
Trial, etc.
"O Livingston's died once again, Sir; The same he's done
now every year..."
After jeering at the literary style of the Protocols, an Encyclopedia
Britannica definition is cited:
"The Protocols are supposed to be a report of a series of
24 meetings held in Basle in 1897, at the time of the First Zionist
Congress. There plans were said to have been worked out whereby
Jews, . . . were to corrupt the entire Christian civilization,
and on the ruins of Christendom erect a world state ruled over
by Jews and Freemasons. Various devices are described which the
Jews planned to use; among these the use of liquor to befuddle
the leaders of European opinion, the corruption of European womanhood,
the stirring up of economic distress, and plans to blow up the
various capitals of Europe".
This is in line with Biblical prophecies about the ripening of
the Red Satanic Pharisee forces at the end of this period, foreseen
by Christ in His Olivet discourse (Matt. 24, Mark 13, etc; II
Thes. 2) describing the "falling away" now in our churches,
etc, as well as world Red dictatorship.
BUT, an article reprinted by the publication of Seton Hall's
Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies is, instead, quoted:
Seton Hall is run by a Jewish "convert", Osterreicher,
who devotes this "Catholic" Institute to drooling over
the beauties of Talmudism, that is Pharisaism, which Dumb Dove
Christians mistakenly call "Judaism". - -- [Judaism
was NEVER the religion of the Old Testament. It would more appropriately
be called "YAHWEHISM" or "HEBREWISM" or "ABRAHAMISM",
"Judaism" was and is "Pharisaism". --BeWISE]
But, more interesting than the above Russian and Kosher affiliations
is the fact that CURTISS is a writer for the UNIVERSAL JEWISH
ENCYCLOPEDIA on the Protocols (Vol.1(?) - copyrighted 1941 and
1948) under "Elders of Zion Protocols".
Curtiss shares the "Universal Jewish Encyclopedia"
job on the Protocols with Theodore H. GASTER (pp. 46-60) and GASTER
is a Big Shot Jew listed in "Who's Who in WORLD Jewry of
1955. There like Curtiss, he is listed as a Guggenheim Fellow.
Our tax money made him a Fulbright Professor, Univ. of Rome,
1951-52. Since 1947 he has been with the Hebrew Union School
of Ed., N.Y. and is contributing editor of the "Universal
Jewish Encyclopedia".
Our Senate Committee calls upon another "impartial"
judge of the PROTOCOLS which are "killed" with this:
"One need not be a specialist in historical research or
have any extensive knowledge of matters Jewish to see through
the fraudulent nature of the 'Protocols' after a cursory glance".
This is quoted from a work called: "Anti-Semitism, Historically
and Critically Examined" by HUGO VALENTIN of Sweden.
The little three-page harangue ends with a paragraph including
this: "The subcommittee believes that the peddlers of the
'Protocols' are peddlers of un-American prejudice who spread hate
and dissension among the American people... they, like the Communists
would set religion against religion. Both would subvert the American
system"
The PROTOCOLS are merely a series of plans by which the "animals"
may be lured into cowbarns for milking. They lack the smut,
the blasphemy of Scripture, the Christ-hating properties of the
TALMUD. Our statesmen speak in synagogues, Yeshivas and other
institutions erected for the promulgation of the TALMUD!
"If it were possible to prove their authenticity" (received
from a secret source, named)" and to discover the persons
who head this world plot and hold the bloody threads in their
hands, the 'mystery of iniquity' would be broken, but it must
remain inviolate until its incarnation in the 'son of perdition'.
For any observing, reflecting Christian, are there really too
few proofs of the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion in the
world round about and in the events for which his country and
the universe are the theatre, which follow before ones eyes in
a whirlwind of iniquity like an uninterrupted storm. . . ?"
(p. 250).
The Senate Committee report on the Protocols repeats the various
"killings" the Protocols have had by the inventions
of Jewry. These include:
1. That the Protocols were "forgeries" invented by
the Russian czarist police:
"More than 60 years ago the czarist intelligence service
concocted and peddled a confection called the 'Protocols of the
Elders of Zion'..." Again:
"It was clearly demonstrated...that large portions of the
Protocols were plagiarized from a book written to discredit the
government of Napoleon III. Moreover, the French volume, it has
been shown, was once the property of the Russian political police;
and there is other evidence to indicate that the 'protocols' originated
with and were used by the Russian political police".
2. "At a recent trial in Bern, Switzerland, the court declared
the 'Protocols' to be forgeries".
AHAD HA-AM's (Ginsberg's) role as a dynamic of worldwide Zionism,
as a prophet, as a motivating force in the secret society which
preceded the World Zionist Organization, is all set forth on bended
knee, as it were, by the author, Leon Simon, of this book on "AHAD
HA-AM". But, when the accusation was made that he constructed
the Protocols, screams of rage rent the Jewish world. This Russian
Jew later moved to England. But in Russia he had devoted himself
so diligently to TALMUDIC study that "Rabbi Joseph Saul Nathanson
of Lemberg, one of the greatest talmudists then living" treated
him as an equal. Ginsberg was raised in the Hasidic, demon-invoking,
cabalistic voodoo branch of Talmudism, called Hassidism. Until
he was fifteen his father had provided him with a tutor in TALMUD.
He would have found no trouble in systematizing its program for
ruthless world power for the "humans".
Napoleon III had obtained the crown by chicanery after being
elected to head a Republic.
His uncle, Napoleon Bonaparte, had drowned Europe in Christian
blood. The approach of his armies was the signal for the burning
of ghetto gates, wild enthusiasm on the part of Jewry, the election
of Jewish mayors and other officials. The Pope was driven into
exile, although he had been of "liberal" mind. He came
back with the fall of Napoleon ridded of his former leanings
toward Jewish "liberalism". Jewish encyclopedias hail
Napoleon as Jewry's boy friend.
After the wave of Jewish power unloosed by the French revolution,
in which Jewry played such a prominent role, and after the fall
of Napoleon with his opening of the ghetto gate, in all ways,
intelligent Christians all over Europe sensed the situation.
It is not strange that opponents and critics arose, like the German
Hedsche, in 1868, and Gougenot de Mousseaux, with his "Le
Juif", in 1869. Nor is it strange that these informed men
should have made statements about this Jewish program similar
to those in the Talmudic Protocols.
Assassination ended the irrefutable writing of the well-known
de Mousseaux, just as death threats and a bombing threatened to
end the paper of the late crusader, Conde McGinley, from time
to time.
In 1895 "In spite of contrary affirmations, I maintain
that Jews are first of all JEWS and afterwards English, and if
this were otherwise I would be greatly distressed for Judaism.
I do not intend to spend time on the absurdity that a sentiment
of limited nationality should be imposed on a people above cosmopolitan
human aspirations which have been taught to me by the words of
the most sacred Sages of my race".
Yes, the foul-mouthed rabbis of the Talmud are called "SAGES".
Their laws include the one which holds that if a Jew is trying
to kill an "animal" or GOY, and in the process kills
a "human", or Jew, he is innocent of murder. His aim
purifies the murder of a "human". (See photostatic
exhibits 90-2 in my "Plot Against Christianity".
The head of the Political Police, Gen. Orgewsky, she said, had
sent agents to Paris to manufacture the false documents. They
copied citations from Jewish philosophers and searched in the
annals of the French revolution for themes and incendiary discourses
to represent the Jewish people as a band of assassins. The very
famous Ratchkowsky, the Princess said, was charged with this job.
He was Chief of the Russian Secret Police at Paris and with him
was Manassiewitch-Manouioff. Also there was Mathieu Golovinsky.
"His mother had great properties in the region of d'Oufa
where I owned an estate", she said. "Golovinsky came
to see me and I received him as the son of his mother whom I knew,
but I did not know he was attached to the secret police. One
day he showed me and several of my friends the writing on which
he was working with Ratchkowsky and Manouioff. He told us that
this manuscript ought to demonstrate that there is a vast Jewish
conspiracy against the peace of the world. The only means, according
to him, of combatting this conspiracy, was the expulsion of all
the Jews from Russia. All this made us laugh. But Golovinsky
seemed very proud of his work."
"I examined the manuscript several times; and my friends
which included an American lady did the same. The manuscript
was in French, handwritten, but in different handwritings, on
yellowish paper. I remember perfectly that on the first page
there was an enormous spot of bluish ink. . ." There are
more details.
Shortly after the above was as printed, the Jewish Tribune April
22, 1921 came out with the news that Radziwill had made a public
report on this in Brooklyn, from a "sense of duty".
The Jewish world was charmed. The Protocols had been KILLED
flat.
Then it came out that Golovinsky had been recalled before 1900
from Paris. In London's "Plain English" journal for
March 19 and April 2, 1921, were signed articles teliing how
Radziwill had been shot at by Lord Salisbury, had then gone to
Africa where she took advantage of the famous Cecil Rhodes (was
his mistress) and forged a huge cheque in his name and was sentenced
to prison for this.
She had been born in St. Petersburg around 1880 as countess Rzewuska
and had left Berlin where she had been mixed up with Bismark,
so she said. She was regarded with some distrust, suspected
as being a secret political agent for Germany. Before the Boer
war she had disappeared completely from the St. Petersburg horizon.
Then it was learned she was in Africa with Cecil Rhodes (Note:
who used to report to the Rothschilds in London yearly according
to Jewish history).
The fact that Ratchkowsky was not in Paris in 1904 or 1905; the
news that the Protocols were already inthe hands of Nilus in 1901
and he translated them into Russian that same year, and issued
them as a brochure in 1902, sadly compromised the testimony of
Radziwill concerning the Protocols being fabricated in Paris while
she lived on the Champs Elysees during 1904-5. Then the famous
Msg. JOUIN came out with the printed statement that the Paris
registry bore no trace of any Princess Radziwill living on the
Champs Elysees in 1904-5. In recent years one still had to be
registered with the authorities in Paris, whether as a resident
or mere visitor, as tourists know.
Pages of data concerning the colossal ramifications of power
wielded by Achad Ha-Am (Ginsberg), his activities in Palestine
and world Jewry as far reaching as the powers of the well known
Jacob Schiff - appear in the work of A. Netchvolodow. "L'
Empereur Nicolas II et Les Juifs - Essay on the Russian Revolution
and its connection with the contemporary worldwide activity of
Jewry" (to translate the last of the title). His part in
the first Zionist Congress at Basle where presumably the Protocols
were proposed as a world Jewish program, the rapturous eulogies
of the Jewish encyclopedias, even this last 1960 Jewish Publication
Society of America volume, "ACHAD HA-AM", would make
his authorship reasonable.
But actually no authorship is necessary for a program that sets
forth exactly what is happening, much of which is foretold in
Scripture in the rise of the seventh Red world government, now
in action in the Jewish creation, the United Nations, and the
fact that the Temple has at last been rebuilt in Jerusalem ready
for the Anti-Christ Pharisee (since 1968).
LOUIS MARSHALL was one of Jacob Schiff's cohorts in founding
the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE of world financial and industrial
Jewish powers. A book could be written on the powers wielded
by him and his sons and their communistic Marshall Foundation.
In the "House Committee. on Un-American Activities Dies
Report: Communist Front Organizations", there are no less
than 27 listings.
Back in 1938 and 1939 when I did considerable speaking in Detroit,
I used to be entertained at the executives table at the Ford plant.
Harry Bennett, personnel director for Henry Ford (who afterwards
was cowed and wrote a pro-Jewish screed) showed me the picture
of the Jews in a huge picture, he had in his office of the Ford
Riot they stirred. A truck load of typewriters and used tables
was sent me for my office by the Red Squad, at Ford direction.
Bennett described how the Jews had driven Ford off the road
in his car in an effort to kill him and how his wife had plead
with him to cease his Jewish exposures and live for her sake.
For this reason he retracted.
Ford's statement goes on to state that: "I deem it my duty
to make amends for the wrong done the Jews...by asking their forgiveness...by
retracting the offensive charges laid at their door by these publications.
. ." The publications are to be "withdrawn from circulation"
and "that henceforth the Dearborn Independent will be conducted
under such auspices that articles reflecting on the Jews will
never again appear in its columns. Finally, let me add that this
statement is made on my own initiative and wholly in the interest
of right and justice.
This "retraction" was dated June 30, 1927.
How the Ford money and Foundation fell under the control of the
Jews and their collectivist agencies is another story. FORD never
changed his mind.
Rev. Gerald WINROD was doing an eye-opening job in his paper
which had some 100,000 subscribers, I understand. He told me
that Ford gave him $20,000 when he ran for office in Kansas at
that time, on an anti-Pharisee platform.
I was working on the "OCTOPUS", which my husband,who
afterwards regretted it, had me put out under a pen name. Ford
gave me $5,000 in April or May of 1939 so that I could add to
my office staff which that year cost $12,000.
One of our lawyers, during the infamous "sedition trial"
to prosecute anti-Communists as Nazi "fascists", stated
that none of the defendants had ever been as anti-Pharisee as
Henry Ford had been. A public blast was issued from the Ford
staff stating that FORD had never had any dealings with the so-called
"seditionists". So, a separate trial aimed to dislodge
the offending lawyer, Mr. Laughlin, I was put on the witness stand
and testified what is written above. This was at the suggestion
of Dr. Winrod who said one or the other of us should spill the
truth. THERE WAS SILENCE - NO DENIAL from the Ford organization
or Henry himself.
"The New York World" of Feb. 17, 1921 published an
interview with Mr. FORD, in the course of which he was asked:
"Is your belief that the Jews are endeavoring to control
the world based in any degree on the so-called PROTOCOLS... said
to have been formulated by the Elders of Zion? You know, of course,
that these have been denounced as forgeries or inventions. Do
you believe they are genuine? He replied: "The only statement
I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what
is going on. They are sixteen years old and have fitted the world
situation up to this time. They fit it now."
"This confession in our opinion is another link in the chain
of prophecy. As we read it we were impressed that the great millionaire
went further than the circumstances of the case required him to
go. To put it another way, we do not believe the editor of the
"Independent", Mr. Ford's paper, was either as foolish
or as wicked as the confession of its proprietor would make him
appear. We believe he had good grounds for publishing some of
the things about the Jews which he did publish, and that whether
Mr. Ford was aware of it or not he, Mr. Ford, might have found
corroborative evidence thereof had he looked for it. Indeed,
the pressure brought to bear upon Mr. Ford to make his confession
was in itself such corroborative evidence. The pressure came
from the Jews - all over the world, and in the face of it Mr.
Ford was panic-stricken. He is one of the richest men in the
world, and of course conscious of the power that money brings
with it; but he was made to feel that the Jews'have more money
and hence more power than he, and that in such a cause their money
and their power can be quickly mobilized against an opponent,
and with crushing consequences.
The note to Matthew 2:4 is as nauseous. After defining the scribes
as those who made copies of the Scriptures, is this: "To
this legitimate work the scribes added a record of rabbinical
decisions on questions of ritual" (Note: actually on questions
of the supremacy of Oral law over Scriptural law, called Halachoth,
singular, Halachah -ED) "the new code resulting from those
decisions (MISHNA); the Hebrew sacred legends (GEMARA) forming
with the MISHNA the TALMUD".
To call the thousands of pages of endless drivel, criminal filth
on sub-sewer themes, which comprise the argumentation called GEMARA,
"Hebrew sacred legends" is too nauseous to describe.
If you will look-thru even 100 of the nearly 300 photostats
in my "Plot Against Christianity", divided into Mishna
and Gemara, not to speak of thousands of pages not reproduced
from the Talmud, you would understand why I wrote "AWFUL"
beside the footnotes described, in my copy of the Schofield Bible.
If you need a mild stomach cleansing you might pick up a copy
of the "Kitzur", or abbreviated, "Schuchan Aruch",
or "Code of Jewish Law", originally compiled by the
Talmudic specialist Joseph Caro, in 1565. It became, to quote
the Universal Jewish Encylopedia, "the standard authoritative
source for Judaism".
Chapters 4 and 5 of the condensation of Caro from the Talmud,
are devoted to the subject of how to behahave in a privy, a product
of "the reprobate mind", as Paul called it.
"RITUAL MAGIC" by E.M. Butler-Schrode, Professor of
German in, the University of Cambridge, compiled a sickening array
of these manuscripts found in museums (Cambridge Univ. Press,
1949). Her lighthearted approach to this subject as an "intellectual"
topic does not alter the formidable impact of the material. That
communistic proponent of free love, BERTRAND RUSSELL, calls it,
according to the paper cover of the book: "Delightful reading
and highly informative". It is the latter.
The note to Matthew 2:4 continues:
After stating that the Mishna and Gemara together form the Talmud
(which is correct) comes this: "commentaries on the O.T.
(Midrashim); reasonings upon these (HAGADAH); and finally, mystical
interpretations which found in Scripture meanings other than the
grammatical, lexical, and obvious ones (the KABBALA); not unlike
the allegorical method of Origen, or the modern Protestant 'spiritualizing
interpretation'".
Have you ever heard a Christian minister explain what Christ
was talking about in Matthew 15 and Mark 7 when the Pharisees
razzed Him about handwashing and He countered with their shyster
way of dedicating their goods, theoretically, to the Temple so
they could tell their parents they could expect no support from
them as all they had belonged to "God"?
The whole Talmud book of YADAYIM (hands) is based on the Pharisee
handwashing in connection with their demonology. The demons invoked
stick around until ushered off with water, they presumably live
in. The Pharisees denounced Christ for not practicing this rite.
TASHLIK is a ceremony, says the Jewish Ency. (1905), for the
afternoon of Jewish New Year's Day: "it is customary to congregate
near a running stream", and the ZOHAR is said to refer to
it. Bread is thrown in for the demons and "The Cabalistic
practice of shaking the ends of one's garments at the ceremony.
. . The Orthodox Jews of New York perform the ceremony in large
numbers from the Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges".
Excerpts from the Zohar were put out by him in 1949, under the
same auspices.
The book is entitled: "ZOHAR - The Book Of Splendor."
Its first words in the Introduction are:
"The book of ZOHAR, the most important literary work of
the Kabbalah, lies before us in some measure inaccesible and silent,
as befits a work of secret wisdom..." The duty of cohabitation
is the constant theme. Concerning a man away from home: "it
is his duty, once back home, to give his wife pleasure...There
is a twofold reason for this duty of cohabitataion. First, this
pleasure is a religious one, giving joy also to the DIVINE PRESENCE...and
for this reason 'thou shalt visit thy habitation and not sin',
in gladly carrying out the religious duty to have conjugal intercourse
before the Presence" (p. 35). That is only a starter.
If the dear misguided Schofield clergy really wanted to know
what the "spiritualizing" interpretation of Scripture
is in the Cabala, they should have studied the book of ZOHAR.
Scholem tells how from 1500 to 1800 the Zohar was "a source
of doctrine and revelation equal in authority to the Bible and
Talmud" (p.7). Then it became less known to "the broad
masses" until the 18th century: "the Jewish Enlightenment
again brought it into prominence, seeking to make it an active
force in its own struggle...supplementing the Bible and Talmud
on a new level of religious consciousness". The ZOHAR is
termed "the mystical-theosophical interpretation of Scripture"
(p. 20) which simply means converting the Old Testament into
a glorification of voodoo paganism and sex-worship. And it calls
one of the Talmudic rabbis, Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, "the
holy lamp". It should be read after a sound night's sleep
and, like the Talmud, on an empty stomach.
God, in the Zohar, as thruout the Talmud, is the "EnSof"
or nature essence, without any attribute and can neither know
nor be known. Which, of course disposes of the Bible, His WORD.
"Director of Research, BENJAMIN-MANDEL"
This Jewish gentleman issued a thoroughly kosher report.
Number 9 of the charges concerning the Protocols states:
"At a recent trial in Bern, Switzerland, the court declared
the 'PROTOCOLS' to be forgeries".
"We rejoice to learn that on May 14, 1935, the Cantonal
Court of Berne, Switzerland, openly denounced the so-called 'Protocols
of the Elders of Zion' as forgeries, obvious plagiarism, immoral,
and manifestly prepared for the purpose of inciting popular passion
against the Jews". Thus said the "New York Evening
Post", May 14, 1935.
BUT when the Swiss Court of Appeals on Nov. 1, 1937 not only
acquitted the principal defendant, Sylvio Schnell, and assessed
the entire cost of the trial, 30,000 francs, against the state
and reversed the verdict, Jewry kept SILENCE! The decision cited
the fact that the Marxist-Judge Meyer had heard not one witness
for the defense; had kept no Court record of the proceedings;
and detailed other irregularities of the trial.
The defendants had been arrested on complaint of the Federation
of Jewish Communities of Switzerland on the charge that they had
violated Article 14 of the Swiss law against distributing obscene
literature, at a public meeting - the Protocols. The Appeals
Court ruled that the "experts" for the Jews, C. A. Loosi
and Prof. A. Baumgarten, appointed by Judge Meyer, not only were
biased on the Jewish question, but, moreover, the authenticity
of the Protocols had no bearing on the case since they are of
a political nature and do not belong in the category of obscene
literature.
The Appeals Court also denounced "the prejudice and gross
irregularities" which had been committed in the trial. Not
a single one of the 40 witnesses for the defense had been permitted
to testify, while all sixteen of the witnesses for the Jewish
Community which brought the suit had been heard. . ."
"The proceedings were accordingly carried on solely upon
the testimony of the Jewish plaintiffs. And further, although
Swiss law demands that in the case of every law suit, shorthand
minutes of the proceedings be taken by an official of the court,
the Judge did not adhere to this condition, but permitted the
Jewish plaintiffs to appoint two private stenographers to keep
the register of the official proceedings during the hearing of
their own witnesses. As, therefore, no legal record of the proceedings
was kept, it follows that the whole procedure, and the verdict
itself, are both null and void".
One is tempted to say the same for the pompous "Report of
the Senate Committee (Benny Mandel's) concerning the Protocols".
[END]
"The Jewsh religion as it is today traces its descent, without
a break, thru all the centuries, from the Pharisees.
HOOKING THE SENATE COMMITTEE
A most well-informed gentleman on my mailing list recently sent
me "A Report Prepared by the Subcommittee to Investigate
the Administration of the Internal Security Act . . . To "The
COMMITTEE On The JUDICIARY, UNITED STATES SENATE". It is
entitled:
"A Coward Dies a Thousand Deaths", said Shakespeare
Since 1905, when the PROTOCOLS became known and widely read,
one conflicting denial, "killing" the Protocols"
once and for all", has succeeded another. I am reminded
of a song my mother used to sing, a jingle, rather, concocted
on the subject of the explorer, Livingstone, being successively
declared to be dead only to appear again. It went like this:
The SENATE JOB
A one-page "INTRODUCTION" (signed by Keating and
Dodd) is followed by a three page declaration entitled:
"A REPORT On A FORGERY: THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED
ELDERS OF ZION"
"The more one examines the 'Protocols', the more they show
themselves to be absurd, contradictory, childish..."
JOHN S. CURTISS
The next "great" authority cited to prove the Protocols
a lie and a forgery is John S. Curtiss who lists himself in "Who's
Who's in America" as having been on the staff at Columbia
Univ. as Instructor of history l934-6; Brooklyn College 1935-6;
archivist of Franklin D. Roosevelt Library, Hyde Park, N.Y. ,l94l-2
and on his OSS, l942-5; Fellow of Russian Inst. 1946-8; Guggenheim
Fellow 1954-5; author of books on Russia; now on faculty of Duke
Univ. since l945.
ANOTHER "IMPARTIAL WITNESS"
This "impartial" authority is another Big Shot Jew
listed as such in Who's Who in World Jewry (1955) as a writer
of Jewish books, etc, and for 23 years Chairman of the SWEDISH
ZIONIST ORGANIZATION. Herbert Willett (of my RED NETWORK) adds
his "forgery" bit.
HOW ABOUT ANOTHER REPORT?
Would this Senate Committee also denounce the Jewish Pharisee
religion consigning Christ to eternal Hell under "boiling
semen" and all of His followers to eternal Hell under "boiling
excrement"? Or reprimand the doctrine that all non-Pharisees
rank as "the people who are like an ass - slaves who are
considered the property of the master" (the Talmudist) (Kethuboth
llla, etc)?? Or take a shot at the "great" Maimonides,
Talmudic idol who taught that it is a crime to free ANY slave
unless he be a "Jew"? How about a lecture on the teaching
from one end of the TALMUD to the other that it is always sinless
of a grown man if he rape a baby girl UNDER three years and one
day old ? Yes, TRUE. Also illegal.
PROTOCOLS AND TALMUD
The overall spirit of both Talmud and Protocols is identical,
namely that ANY means is justifiable to subdue "the people
who are like an ass" - the GOYIM or non-humans. Naturally
humans do not wish the animals to scamper about unfenced. They
must be milked and beefed or their eggs taken, at the will of
the MASTERS. Any resentment on the part of the non-Pharisee "animals"
is always treated as "anti-Semitism", or "persecution
of the JEWS". The Talmudic doctrine that it is sinless to
cheat, lie, steal and murder if the subject be a goy is never
disputed. Who are the peddlers of HATE? Why not a Senate report
on this cause of world unrest? [BRAVO Elizabeth!! --BeWISE]
NILUS TRANSLATES THEM
It was in 1905 that Serge Nilus, a Russian, translated the Protocols
from the French and in 1906 a copy was registered in the British
Museum. It is clear from the statement of Nilus who included
these Protocols in his book, "The Great in the Small"
that he considered them part of the Biblical Anti-Christ plan.
He had received them in 1901. He wrote, in part:
The TRUTH
The only reason in the world that B'nai B'rith and its Jewish
leaders move heaven and hell to suppress the circulation of the
Protocols is that they outline the positive program (set forth
in the TALMUD), although unknown to Christians) which any observer
may see is going on today. Whether or not the Protocols represent
the program decided upon at the first Zionist Congress in l897,
or not, is unimportant.
AHAD HA-AM (Ginsberg)
A whole worshipful book devoted to exalting Asher Zvi Ginsberg,
known as AHAD HA-AM ("one of the people"), was published
in 1960 by the top Jewish Publication Society of America. This
outfit is an adjunct of the world-powerful American Jewish Committee
in which the banking and industrial Jewish powers of the world
converge. Its "worldwide responsibility" to world Jewry
is annually reported in their official American Jewish Year Books.
From Algeria to China and New York they raise up and knock down
opponents like bowling pins.
THE BOOKS COVER
Born in 1856, died in 1927, the cover of the book on AHAD HA-AM
includes this: "Ahad Ha-Am, no less than Theodore Herzl,
has exerted an influence on contemporary Jewish thought affecting
the communal, the Zionist and the religious aspects of life.
His spiritual nationalism is still echoed from pulpit and platform
and expounded in books and journals. His ideas have become current
intellectual coin, so that even their users are frequently unaware
of their origin. Ahad Ha-Am lives on in Jewish thought..."
etc.
THE JOLY ARGUMENT
The Senate statement above that "large portions of the Protocols
were plagiarized from a book written to discredit the government
of Napoleon III", refers to the old saw used to "kill"
the Protocols, namely that the Protocols were copied frdm a book
by Maurice Joly in l864. Joly was implying that Napoleon III
was following the Talmudic program of the Protocols. A reading
of Jewish hisories might raise the suspicion that he may have
been correct.
LUCIEN WOLF in 1920
Lucien Wolf, the British Barney Baruch of his day, "killed"
off the Protocols by pompous discourses to the effect that the
Protocols were merely quotes from the German by the name of Hermann
Hedsche who, he said, had been fired for delinquency from the
Prussian postal service; that he borrowed material from contemporary
Russians and from Gougenot de Mousseaux, one who blamed "democratic"
revolutions on the Jews. He bothered with no proofs. This "democratic"
Jewish picture, however, is marred a bit by his own statement
in the "London Pall Mall Gazette" of Nov. 24, 1895:
DEATH OF DES MOUSSEAUX
To quote a carefully documented French work: "Charles Choliac,
a friend of Gougenot des Mousseaux had been invited to be his
guest Oct. 3, 1876 at his home in Coulommiers, near Paris. About
ten o'clock that evening des Mousseaux laughingly showed him a
letter saying: "Do not eat, or drink anything until you have
first tried it on your dog, because at a secret meeting held yesterday,
you were condemned to death by the Jews. Nine hours later, after
showing this letter, he died suddenly after taking Holy Communion
as was his habit at 7 AM in the little chapel of the monastery
of Coulommiers". (p. 65: "L' Empereur Nicholas II et
les Juifs"; Chiron, Editeur, 40, Rue de Seine, Paris, 1924.
LUCIEN WOLF is one of the "authorities" cited in the
"Universal Jewish Encyclopedia" article written by the
Senate Committee's "authority", John S. Curtiss, and
Theodore Gaster.
THE RADZIWILL "KILL"
The Senate Committee report also makes use of the big "kill"
assertion that the Protocols were invented by the Russia police
(to cause pogroms, etc.). That job was beautifully put over by
worldwide dissemination of the testimony of Princess Radziwill
and her friend Mrs. Hurlbut. The Protocols, said Radziwill,
were invented to convince the son of the assassinated Alexander
II that his father had been assassinated by Jews instead of by
members of the upper, class.
MRS HURLBUT
Princess Radziwill emphasized that she was speaking of the years
1904 and 1905 while she was living on the Champs Elysees in Paris.
Then the American friend mentioned by Radziwill gave an interview
to the "American Hebrew" of New York which appeared
in their issue of March 4, 1921. She backed up everything Radziwill
had said, every detail, including, of course, the big spot of
bluish ink on the manuscript. S he told how the agent of the
secret police had come to the Radziwill home directly from the
Bibliotheque Nationale (National Library) to the Champs Elysees
Paris home of Radziwill, how she remembered the manuscript tied
up with white ribbon on yellowish paper with a big inkspot and
exclaimed about it being the work of Golovinsky her friend. There
was no doubt that this document and the Protocols were one and
the same, identical. So, at the beginning of 1921 the princess
and Mrs. Hurlbut had backed up Lucien Wolf; established that the
Protocols had been fabricated under the very eyes of the Princess
and Mrs Hurlbut by three agents of the Russian Secret Police:
Ratchkowsky, Manassiewitch-Manouiloff and Golovinsky, who had
shown the manuscript around from hand to hand. This false manuscript
had been concocted in 1904 and 1905 in Paris.
T H E N . . .
Then came an article by M. Vladimir Bourtzew in his paper, "The
Common Cause", in which he berated the Protocols but called
attention to certain little errors in Radziwill's revelations.
This was the April 14, 1921 issue. The "Jewish Tribune"
of April 29 screamed with rage that such an article could be written
without the consent of the Anti-Defamation Lg. of B'nai B'rith
which had taken all measures to prevent the publication of the
Protocols in America. This was dreadful! for Bourtzew had denounced
the Protocols but mentioned the fact that Ratchkowsky in 1904-5
was NOT IN PARIS and couldn't have met with Radziwill and GoIovinsky
because he had been recalled from Paris in advance of the Russian-Japanese
war (which broke out Feb. 6, 1904).
IN 1905 AND 1917
Nilus bewailed the fact that the Protocols as a program of Jewish
power aroused little interest before the revolution engineered
by Jewry in 1905. After the Red Revolution of 1917 they aroused
interest all over Europe and the USA.
WHY ALL THE DENIALS?
It is curious that our great Senate Committee has to use the
old saw about the Protocols having "originated with the Russian
political police", Radzwill's mythical pals, where they all
were not. Radziwill's interview at the Hotel Astor in New York,
carried around the world by the Jewish press, had fallen with
a momentary thud only to be revived ever since by one or another
of the hirelings of the Jewish press. And that "spot of
blue ink" was always a clincher in the various manufactures.
M. du Chalya was puffed and quoted as backing Radziwill's tale
and so for some 50 years the denials have gone on. But always
a conflict of facts.
WHY DON'T THEY TELL ONE STORY?
It is dizzy work to read the conflicting tales concerning the
origin of the Protocols in Jewish publications. Now, we taxpayers
pay for another rehash by the Senate Committee. Now that the
Soncino English translation of the TALMUD, endorsed by highest
Pharisee authorities, is available at last to read, for the first
time, anyone may see that the TALMUD is far filthier, more criminal
and anti-Christ than the relatively pale Protocols ever were.
Why deny an outline for accomplishing exactly what the whole
TALMUD teaches? Why print the Talmud? Bold, indeed!
HENRY FORD
When Henry Ford printed the articles known as the "International
Jew", the Talmudists went into hysteria. If you are interested
in the gloatings on how Ford was brought to his knees presumably,
and made to publicly apologize, one interesting source is Volume
I of "LOUIS MARSHALL - Champion of Liberty - Selected Papers
and Addresses", put out by the Jewish Publication Society
of America in 1957.
"THE CRAWL"?
Gloatingly, on p. 376 of Vol.1 of the Marshall book, is the statement
extracted from Henry Ford. It is preceded by Marshall's communication
with Sam Untermyer, etc. Ford's apology includes his plea that
he had been too busy to know what was being printed in his Dearborn
Independent and had delegated such duties to men he trusted but
that he had no idea that the general nature" of the data
on the Protocols had been so repulsive to Jewry. "Had I...I
would have forbidden their circulation without a moment's notice,
because I am fully aware of the virtues of the Jewish people as
a whole. . . . " (and more praises).
FORD GIVES ANTI-SEMITES FUNDS
In l939, Harry Bennett told me he would like to have me meet
Wm. Dudley Pelley whose occultism I had criticized. I had never
met him. He said: "He will be coming in here any day to
get money and GET IT. He is a swell guy. All that stuff is
just a gag with him!"
BEFORE FORD'S APOLOGY
One may shrug off the Protocols as "forgeries" (of
what?), but one cannot deny that the one supreme authority, the
"LAW" of Talmudic Judaism is the Babylonian Talmud.
Such top books put out by the Jewish Publication Society of America,
adjunct of the World High Comman, the American Jewish Committee,
as "The Messiah Idea in Jewish History", etc repeat
the theme of the duty of WORLD power by the Talmudists whose religion
is the Tradition of the Pharisees in written form. - -
PEACE SHIP OPENS HIS EYES
Mr. FORD had been convinced of the Jewish responsibility for
World War I by two Jews on his Peace Ship (See Ford Peace Party
in my "RED NETWORK", and the activities of Rosika Schwimmer
and Louis Lochner). This was covered in an interview in the "Jewish
World", Jan. 5, 1922. He determined to make the truth known
to his fellow Americans when he returned to this country, he said.
DR. GRAY ON THE PROTOCOLS
I spoke over the Moody Bible Institute radio a number of times,
at special meetings and in the Moody church. The Moody radio
teacher of the Bible for many years was Mrs. Iris I. McCord who
was a close and most beloved friend to her death. She told me
of the incessant pressure being put on the head of the Moody Bible
Institute, Dr. Gray, to disavow his belief that the Protocols
are Jewry's plan in action. But in vain, although some of the
incidents were most threatening. Dr. Gray steadfastly refused
to change his position. The Moody Monthly for Sept. 1927 carried
an article by him on the"apology", forced from Henry
FORD by the then chief of the High Command American Jewish Committee,
Louis MARSHALL. Dr. Gray wrote:
FURTHER LIGHT
I knew Dr. Gray. At that time (l932-4) he understood the anti-Christ
subversion role of the so-called Jew as I did not. Like the Christian
ministry as a whole, however, he knew nothing of the Tradition
of the Pharisees' Babylonian Talmud, its written form,, which
is the sole guide and authority of so-called Judaism today and
since 70 A.D. Then the fall of the Jerusalem Temple, the disappearance
of the Sadducees and departure of Scripture-believers...into Christianity,
left the Pharisees in sole control of distorting and reversing
Scripture, as Christ stated in such fiery terms (Matt. 23; John
8:37-44, etc, etc). I also knew the late Dr. Arno C. Gaebelein.
DR. ARNO C. GAEBELEIN
Dr. Gaebelein regarded the Protocols, like Dr. Gray, with respect.
The brilliant Dr. Gaebelein was a guest in my home, presented
me with his books, and we were entertained by him in New York.
He also knew no more about the TALMUD than other clergy - which
is nil. With the best intentions in ihe world, it would be interesting
to find out how the two devout Christians came to publish, or
at least to sign as co-editors, certain notes in the Schofield
Bible. I might guess that they took the word of some "nice,
sympathetic" Rabbi for the statements in the note to Matthew
3:7 and to Matthew 2:4. They were two of eight consulting editors.
THOSE SCHOFIELD NOTES
The notes to Matt. 3:7 include this: "The Pharisees were
strictly a sect...and took an obligation to remain true to the
principles of Pharisaism. They were correct, moral, zealous
and self-denying, but self-righteous (Luke 8:9), and destitute
of the sense of sin and need".
GEMARA - THOSE "SACRED HEBREW LEGENDS"
If Drs. Gray and Gaebelein had ever read the sub-sewer filth
and criminality of the Tradition of the Pharisees in its written
form, the Babylonian Talmud, NOTHING could have made those sincere
Christians put their name to a statement like that. Furthermore,
if the above were true, then Christ was guilty of criminal libel!
HAGADA AND KABALA
Telling big lies for the fun of it is called HAGADA. Talmudic
passages describing God's big feet, his throwing an egg that covers
40 countries and playing with the fish part of each day - that
is Hagada. A compilation of the manuscripts usually copied from
teacher to pupil, on eye-gouging, grave robbing, blood-throwing
voodoo-practices connected with the inter-related Cabal (spelled
several ways) illuminats many things. This Cabalistic voodoo
comprising the necromancy, witchcraft, etc, practices of paganism,
forbidden by the Bible, is usually kept secret with teacher allowing
pupil to copy directions directly.
KABALISTIC "BLOOD ACCUSATION"
Under "Blood Accusation", the 1905 "Jewish Encylopedia"
devoted more than seven pages to the trials held from one end
of Europe to the other. Some 122 are itemized and dated. To
quote: "Of the alarmingly large numbers of ritual trials
only a few of the more important and instructive can here be mentioned".
The descriptions start with "the case of Little St. Hugh
of Lincoln... mentioned by Chaucer", a 13th century case.
Thirty-nine in the 19th century are covered. Of course, like
the Protocols, in every country and century, the charges were
false".
SCHOFIELD KABALA NOTE
Picture your own reaction after studying endless data on this
subject, mostly from Jewish sources, to read the following Schofield
Bible footnote which the innocent fundamental Christian ministers
let go out under their sponsorship!
THAT "SPIRITUALIZING" KABBALA
How can one comment? It is too much. The backbone of the Cabala
is centered upon sex, sex, sex. As in the paganism denounced
by the Bible, procreation is worshipped as creation and worshipped
by acts to match. And, in Cabalistic works Bible verses are dragged
in to give "prestige" as in the Talmud, both reversing
the actual teachings of the verses. As Christ told the Pharisees
they were "hypocrites!" and: "Thus have ye made
the commandment of God of none effect by your Tradition!"
GERSHOM SCHOLEM
Gershom Scholem is listed in the big-shot's 1955 "Who's
Who in World Jewry" as an Israel educator and "Prof.
of Kabbala, Hebrew U., Jerusalem since 1933" (born Berlin,
1897). His book, "Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism"
(1946, Schocken Pub., Jerusalem and N.Y.) should be studied by
theological students enlightening them on the persistence of ancient
paganism under the whited sepulchre of "Judaism".
THE SENATE COMMITTEE'S PROTOCOLS REPORT
It is not irrelevant to here state that the Report on the Protocols
by the "Subcommittee to Investigate the Administrafion of
the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws To
the COMMITTEE ON THE JUIDICIARY - United States Senate -August
1964 - (whatta-mouthful!) states:
THE BERNE TRIAL
Yes, ever since 1935 when two men were brought to trial in Berne,
Switzerland, B'nai B'rith and its henchmen have been peddling
the lie that by court decree the Protocols had been declared "forgeries".
That has lasted for 29 years now. And the Senate report finds
it is still useful.
WHAT ARE THE FACTS?
But, what are the facts?
SILENCE FOR FACTS
This has been repeated endlessly ever since.